Weighed against this new pride-secured people, we have listed your nonego-secured children priely, We

Weighed against this new pride-secured people, we have listed your nonego-secured children priely, We

Like the ego-anchored youngsters each kid used many pronominal and you will nominal models to refer to thinking or any other; and you will just like the nonego-anchored college students, zero deviations of sort recognized for the English-speaking students was located (we

Nonego-secured youngsters. Once i features represented inside more detail elsewhere, the nonego-anchored pupils did not differentiate the usage We and you will My according to level of agentivity and you can manage. Regardless if I was the most common mode getting indexing care about within lower prevent of your own agentivity and you may pragmatic control bills (i.e. 94% of all the such as for instance references inside it I), it exact same means was also the preferred means within large stop of your own balances, bookkeeping to own 86% of all of the the means to access I and you can My personal from the nonego-secured youngsters. Ergo the latest nonego-secured kid’s usage of thinking site versions differed in the pride-anchored youngsters just because the including need adjusts so you can adult English (we.elizabeth. there are zero instances of My and you can Myself for the subject updates in ways one to deviated regarding mature utilize), but also for the the quantity that individual forms accustomed list worry about weren’t especially about impression away from agentivity and you will manage.

As nonego-secured children failed to contrastively use notice site variations when deciding to take some other stances by themselves role within the person action, it is interesting to remember one about the time college students provide up such as for instance options they build other linguistic information including modal forms (i.age. gonna , needa , Desire to , hafta ) and commence utilizing voice contrasts (i.age. shifting anywhere between effective, couch potato, and you can middle buildings). Instance utilize has been listed in order to join up with demarcating other deviations out of prototypical department, such as for example generic department and contrasting objectives about the origins regarding tips (find Budwig, 1990; Gee Savasir, 1985) for further talk.

Sumining English-speaking children’s indexing of thinking and other. Between the age several and you may three, I have listed that the band of college students I studied underwent a move inside the whom it chatted about as well as how they spoke about them. Brand new main change is summarized the following. The children began by mainly writing on on their own and you will used various notice resource variations in order to situate on their own in different suggests. This new some elderly nonego-anchored youngsters described both notice and other and you will failed to contrastively utilize care about reference versions to adopt certain stances of thinking, in the event We have advised they make access to choice linguistic resources to help you index different methods notice while others might be based in fields out-of action.

The fresh Italian language-speaking Students

Initial analyses. In contrast to the newest English-speaking college students, the German pupils couldn’t feel split up neatly to your a few line of teams in line with the same official certification. All of the three German college students, including the ego- anchored college students have been from the very first stage away from consolidating words; most of the around three got an MLU out-of around step 3.0 and in truth two of the pupils got MLUs out-of around dos.0. While this produced him or her apparently fit with the brand new ego-secured people explained significantly more than, there are crucial differences regarding the other a few categories out of preliminary analyses. Due to the fact noted a lot more than, the fresh English- talking college students categorized due to the fact ego-anchored primarily described thinking since the subject of its phrases. This is false for your of one’s around three Italian language youngsters. The three Italian language children referred to thinking whenever fifty% of the time (assortment = 49% – 54%) along the four-month analysis. Such-like which dimensions, the three Italian language youngsters checked a lot more just as the nonego-anchored college students demonstrated over. Regarding the 3rd band of first analyses, particularly the number and you can the total amount off deviations inside the care about reference means usage, the newest Italian language children searched each other including the ego-anchored and you can nonego-anchored children. age. instances instance My personal cracked new egg , Myself jump ). One latest area really worth bringing up is that whilst several groups of children lead self or any other sources around a similar speed, brand new Italian language category was far less gonna get it done with pronominal models (discover Otto, 1994).

Komentáre

Pridať komentár

Vaša e-mailová adresa nebude zverejnená.

Vaše osobní údaje budou použity pouze pro účely zpracování tohoto komentáře.